On COMPOSITION and the so-called "Rule of Thirds."
[a response for the Rochester Meet-UP Group "Photo-Editors, posted Dec. 13, 2012]
Black Creek Park, Rochester NY, 2012 |
There are other histories / stories to the Golden Mean /
Golden Ratio / the Divine Proportion. See, for instance:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_ratio
Now we are given a frame by our camera, a viewfinder or
back-screen that reflects the size and proportions of our film / sensor /
light-sensitive recording device. These frames in turn have been defined by
probably three millennia of decorative or artistic representation that had to
match the walls (yes, before the couch, one had to match the walls). The people
of Lascaux did not use frames, they just had caves where ceilings met walls in
one unique surface–no need for frames then!
Thence probably too the need for geometry derived from
architecture. Who says walls, says architecture, says geometry applied to
representation (to match the size and proportion of the walls, people once they
had to move from house to house (Julius Caesar's generals for instance) had to
carry their artwork with them, thence what was mural work became transportable
framed work!
As a result the proportions used in architecture (Greek,
Roman...) mostly derived from human size and proportions and from the
observation of nature other than human nature began to be used in the visual
arts (painting, sculpture...). The XIXth century came and with it photography
that applied all that had been learnt and applied to painting and drawing in
terms of choice of the frame and choice of the organization of information
within that frame.
Carl Chiarenza, SUNY Buffalo 2012 |
To summarize: as we grow as image-makers we tend to learn,
and grow more sophisticated and exacting with ourselves and others. Our
expectations should grow if we want to grow with them. From a single subject in
the center of the frame standing against an uncontrolled background, we grow to
understand that the relationship between background and foreground is important
to generate more meaningful information, use the frame, that piece of
information we extract from the world, fully. Then we divide the frame in two
halves, either vertical or horizontal, to generate a dialogue between 2
elements (sky/ground, speaker one / speaker two), then we combine both and
generate 4 quarters, diagonal lines become obvious. The next step is to divide
the frame in thirds... and here we go.
We can also subdivide each ninth of the frame (2 equidistant
vertical lines define 3 equal vertical thirds, 2 equidistant horizontal lines
define 3 equal horizontal thirds. Combine the 4 lines and you define 9 equal
rectangles, 8 surrounding a ninth central one, "the frame within the
frame") into 9 equal rectangles using the same equidistant vertical and
horizontal "lines of thirds." We then have 9x9, 81 frames to deal
with!! Not mentioning their medians and the diagonals.
The HighLine, NYC, 2011 |
This is all about using geometry to organize space. It is
architecture: at first and mostly safe and predictable, lacking creativity but
necessary for apprenticeship. The next step toward the mastery of the
organization of the frame (composition) is to take risks, in the same way as an
acrobat, a master dancer, an Olympic gymnast or ice-skater LEARNS the skills
(the language, the code, the moves, the tools) FIRST and THEN takes risks and
BECOMES CREATIVE. One has to test and stray away from learnt, predictable and
helpful geometry to use the frame and its guidelines creatively, maintaining at
the same time a sense of balance, harmony, meaningful organization of the frame
supporting and advertising the CONTENT of the image, facilitating the
dialogue/communication between author and audience. It's all work, intuition
(developed thanks to experience and work; intuition without work and experience
is not competence, it’s just a bad habit), imagination (the power to project a
representation of the piece of the world into a meaningful frame and
organization, to produce a MEANINGFUL image.. the rest is just decoration).
Stépane Wrembel, Boulder Coffee, Rochester NY 2012 |
As human beings and social animals, we need to communicate.
Culture has its own codes. Human beings have invented codes for everything in
order for messages to be clearly understood by all within the same group,
culture. Green, orange, red for traffic lights for instance. Imagine someone
from a different culture where those colors mean exactly the opposite; imagine
them driving on Monroe avenue from downtown to Pittsford! Composition is but a
code invented by western culture, we should be aware of it. It has now
travelled through the world as well as other codes have influenced our culture.
We need to learn codes in order to understand other and be understood, generate
information that others can understand. The rule of third is one code, learning
it and applying it helps us organize information in a way that can be
understood by others. Ignoring it may be stupid if one wants to really share
their experience with others, testing and pushing its limits is what the
dedicated and creative person does… sometimes at the risk of straying to far
from the common language and his or her audience, at the risk or satisfaction
of only speaking to an elite of experts like her/him.
Back to our cameras...
(Invitation for fake exhibition) |
All images copyright Bruno Chalifour 2012.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire